Bug#436162: developers-reference: Please document best practices for requesting translations and updates
Hi Nicolas,
Any news on this?
Thank you,
Lucas
On 09/06/08 at 07:47 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 09/06/08 at 02:35 +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Here is an updated patch for the L10N section.
> >
> > This bug is not identical to #474879, but the attached patch will also fix
> > #474879.
>
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> First, thanks for your patch :-)
>
> I took another look at the other i18n/l10n bugs reported against devref,
> as I would like to use the opportunity to address them all.
>
> First, there are two sections about this in devref. There's section 8,
> which you patched (
> http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-l10n.en.html ) and
> section 6.6 (
> http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-i18n
> ).
>
> #478479 and #436162 are fixed by your patch.
>
> #257150 and #483235 are about section 6.6. You provided a patch for
> #257150 last summer.
>
> I'm wondering whether those two sections couldn't be reorganized.
> Section 6.6 could document everything that a "normal" maintainer needs
> to know, while section 8 could be target at people willing to get
> involved into i18n, explaining the Debian i18n infrastructure (and point
> to section 6.6 for some of the gory details).
>
> What do you think?
>
> Besides that, your patch looks good, we just need to change the
> typesetting of a view things, but we will do that before committing.
>
> Thanks again,
> --
> | Lucas Nussbaum
> | lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
> | jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Reply to: