[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#487664: BPP: typo and wrong example



Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.0
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

In section 6.7.9 Best practices for debug packages [bpp-dbg]:

> Note that *the Debian package* should depend on the package that it
> provides debugging symbols for, and this dependency should be versioned.
> For example:
> 
> Depends: libfoo-dbg (= ${binary:Version})

"the Debian package" here should mean "the debug package", and the given
example rather gives an impression to suggest libfoo to depend on its
debug package, which is weird.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=th_TH.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=th_TH.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

developers-reference depends on no packages.

Versions of packages developers-reference recommends:
ii  debian-policy                 3.8.0.1    Debian Policy Manual and related d

-- no debconf information

-- 
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
http://linux.thai.net/~thep/
Index: developers-reference-3.4.0/best-pkging-practices.dbk
===================================================================
--- developers-reference-3.4.0.orig/best-pkging-practices.dbk	2008-06-23 20:33:41.000000000 +0700
+++ developers-reference-3.4.0/best-pkging-practices.dbk	2008-06-23 20:37:14.000000000 +0700
@@ -1745,11 +1745,11 @@
 add an entry to <filename>debian/control</filename> for the debug package.
 </para>
 <para>
-Note that the Debian package should depend on the package that it provides
+Note that the debug package should depend on the package that it provides
 debugging symbols for, and this dependency should be versioned.  For example:
 </para>
 <screen>
-Depends: libfoo-dbg (= ${binary:Version})
+Depends: libfoo (= ${binary:Version})
 </screen>
 </section>
 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: