tags 467102 + pending thanks Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> writes: > On 08/06/08 at 13:30 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: >> LI Daobing <lidaobing@gmail.com> wrote: >>> in the first paragraph of Debian Developer's Reference 5.9.3[1]. I think the >>> new name should also provide the obsolete name, it should be changed to [2]. >>[...] >>> [2] >>> When you make a mistake naming your package, you should follow a two-step >>> process to rename it. First, set your debian/control file to replace, >>> conflict with and provide the obsolete name of the package (see the Debian >>> Policy Manual for details). // snip >> Here's a complete patch for this issue. Please review: > Looks very good. Committed as r5229. Marc -- BOFH #350: paradigm shift...without a clutch
Attachment:
pgpv3uolIiuN6.pgp
Description: PGP signature