Op Tue 1 Apr 2008 om 01:09:34 +0200 schreef Javier Fernandez-Sanguino: > 2008/4/1, Joost van Baal <joostvb-debian-doc@mdcc.cx>: > > I plan to create > > > > manuals/doc-debian/debian/rules > > manuals/doc-debian/doc/Makefile > > Ummm.. I'm not convinced that doc-debian should be under 'manuals'. > The documentation content of doc-debian is actually not part of it, > it's mostly part of the web pages, so it makes no sense putting that > content in SVN. Putting the package build stuff in SVN does make > sense, however... > > Why not in a root-dir packages/, aside with manuals/ which would hold > packages handled by the DDP team but which do *not* include > documentation? OK, I'll do that: packages/doc-debian/debian/rules packages/doc-debian/doc/Makefile manuals/... (I believe there were some documents shipped with doc-debian for which there's no automatic fetching instruction. Perhaps these could get added to our SVN, with a clear note stating it's _not_ the "real" source. We'll see how this will work out.) Thanks, Bye, Joost
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature