On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 09:39:27AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > The workflow for producing the Debian installation instructions uses > *dvipdf*, not dvipdf*m* or dvipdf*mx*. That's a wrapper which envokes > dvips and gs. I have no idea why that was chosen - perhaps just > "historical reasons". Actually, the d-i manual uses dvipdf, but many other documents in the Debian Documentation Project use debiandoc2latexpdf which uses 'pdflatex' as a backend. The reason for this is that the d-i manul is written in Docbook-XML but most other documentation is (still) written using DebiandocSGML. Are there any known issues/recommendations with pdflatex we should take into account in the build process? Regards Javier
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature