[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#332782: Please explain the etch-ignore tag



On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:02:00PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Thank you for agreeing to the licensing[1], could you please tell me the
> relevant years, name and (optional) e-mail address, for the copyright
> notice?

Hmm... as for names and e-mail addreses I think we need to dig that
information first. Years would be 1999-2007, they seem to have been first
written for slink (http://www.es.debian.org/releases/slink/#release-notes).
The DDP  CVS only has the Release Notes since woody (january 2003),
previously they Release Notes resided in the boot-floppies' CVS.

> What do the other co-authors and contributors have to say about this
> licensing?  Do you agree or disagree?

Notice that many of the people listed as co-authors (such as Josip or Adam)
are no longer subscribed to -doc. Some of the past co-authors/contributors
might not even be Debian Developers (or contributors) anymore.

> Obviously enough, I'm *not* going to dig into the CVS logs to collect a
> comprehensive list of individual contributors, unless I first receive
> agreements from an encouraging number of main credited authors and some
> other contributors...   ;-)

I'm pretty sure most of the current editors agree with the licensing. They
are, however, right now out of time to cater this issue (we are trying to
release etch, after all). 

Digging into the CVS logs should not be that hard, in addition to the ones I
listed (editors), I find (in a cursory glance):

- Frédéric Bothamy
- Daniel Nylander
- Roberto C. Sánchez
- Clytie Siddall
- Frederik Schueler
- Frank Lichtenheld
- Adeodato Simón
- Nobuhiro IMAI
- Luk Cleas
- A. Mennucc
- Martin Michlmayr
- Osamu Asoki
- Steve Langasek 
- Jordi Polo

It is worth noting that:

a) Their contributions might not be present in the current RN anymore
b) Some of the patches they provided might be just "typo fixes" and not
actual text. I don't believe those grant one "co-author" status for a
document.

Additionally, references to bugs in the BTS should be reviewed, as some logs
refer to bugs which might have included a patch from the submitter.

Obtaining a contributors list from 1999-2003 might be more difficult,
however, and it still might be relevant.  For example, contents of the
following patch from Chris Tillman for woody's release notes seems to still
be present in etch's Release Notes:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-doc/2001/12/msg00023.html (sent and applied by
Rob Bradford)

The boot-floppies CVS (which held that information) seems not to be available
anymore (or at least I cannot find it in gluck). Does anyone keep a backup of
that one?

Regards

Javier

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: