Re: [PATCH] Improve Etch Release Notes a little.
Hi,
> From: Frans Pop
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve Etch Release Notes a little.
> Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2007 09:51:43 +0100
>
> > On Sunday 04 February 2007 09:19, Kobayashi Noritada wrote:
> > > A Japanese translation reviewer TAKEI Nobumitsu suggested minor
> > > improvement of Etch Release Notes (2 months ago... ;-p) and I've
> > > created a patch based on it. Could you please apply it?
> >
> > To be honest, I do not think this is an improvement. It will make people
> > wonder what the hell a "package-bar" is. Is it related to a sushi-bar
> > maybe?
>
> Hmm..., I should have explained more. :-)
> The mentioned sentence follows descriptions below:
>
> <example>
> Unpacking replacement <var><package-foo></var> ...
> dpkg: error processing <var><package-name-for-foo></var> (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite `<var><some-file-name></var>',
> which is also in package <var><package-bar></var>
> </example></p>
>
> <p>You can try to solve a file conflict by forcibly removing the
> package mentioned on the <em/last/ line of the error message:
>
> For this reason, "package_name" described here may be replaced by
> "pakcage-bar". "package_name" in other areas are good.
So, this patch may also be good.
Thanks,
-nori
Index: en/release-notes.en.sgml
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/debian-doc/ddp/manuals.sgml/release-notes/en/release-notes.en.sgml,v
retrieving revision 1.119
diff -u -r1.119 release-notes.en.sgml
--- en/release-notes.en.sgml 14 Jan 2007 23:15:42 -0000 1.119
+++ en/release-notes.en.sgml 4 Feb 2007 10:40:33 -0000
@@ -960,7 +960,10 @@
<example>
# dpkg -r --force-depends <var>package_name</var>
- </example></p>
+ </example>
+
+ (In this case, <var>package_name</var> is
+ <var><package-bar></var> above.)</p>
<p>After fixing things up, you should be able to resume the
upgrade by repeating the previously described <tt/aptitude/
Reply to: