Re: documentation for novice and newbies
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org, debian-doc@lists.debian.org
 
- Subject: Re: documentation for novice and newbies
 
- From: Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>
 
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:24:47 +0200
 
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20070207202447.22bc6119@think.homenet>
 
- In-reply-to: <20070207165811.GB9927@titan>
 
- References: <ca3d2c8b0702010601x514dc5e9q9bfc316720a2b14c@mail.gmail.com>	<45C6526F.8040800@heard.name>	<200702041750.23814.kamaraju@bluebottle.com>	<20070204235303.GB12822@titan>	<20070205191845.0569c4a0@think.homenet>	<20070206223010.GB11845@titan>	<20070207145816.GC22825@topoi.pooq.com>	<20070207165811.GB9927@titan>
 
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 11:58:11 -0500
Douglas Allan Tutty <dtutty@porchlight.ca> wrote:
> As far as these discussions go, we should probably move to debian-doc
> since this discussion isn't about, directly, solving users' problems.
> What say ye?  If this seems reasonable, let me know and I'll post this
> whole reply as you see it over to debian-doc (this saves debian-doc
> from receiving this from _all_ of us).
I just subscribed. I'm also cross-posting this to debian-doc.
> If they're used to it.  Each of us has a different focus, which is
> good. Mine is the novice who isn't used to anything.
I was planning on writing a more general introduction to computers (OS
agnostic).
> A couple of problems with using versioning/docbook, that probably have
> solutions but I'm unfamiliar with both:  I'm on a slow dial-up line.
> With versioning does that mean that I grab the current version,
> download it which locks others out of grabing it, edit it, then
> upload the new version?  That cycle could take a while and tie up the
> document.  
Concurrent versioning solves exactly that. You download a copy of the
file, edit it locally and then upload the changed file. If the original
file has changed the changes are merged if they don't conflict or you
get a notice and you can solve the conflict manually.
> I _think_ that a wiki makes this a lot faster.  It allows us to
> generate html.  However, it makes it difficult to break it up into
> small documents and link them together again, and to make other
> formats.
I think the wiki should be our primary focus, then use the content from
the wiki to create other versions (html, plain text, ...) using cvs/svn
whatever.
Regards,
Andrei
-- 
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)
Reply to: