Bug#337779: marked as done (release-notes do not suggest re-running lilo)

To: 337779@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#337779: marked as done (release-notes do not suggest re-running lilo)
From: Jens Seidel <jensseidel@users.sf.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 09:06:16 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20061222080616.GA22416@imkf-pc73.imkf.tu-freiberg.de>
Reply-to: Jens Seidel <jensseidel@users.sf.net>, 337779@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200612220048.20604.elendil@planet.nl>
References: <E1GxUom-0006p8-2a@ries.debian.org> <E1EYl0W-0004x4-00@ixion.tartarus.org> <[🔎] handler.337779.D337779.1166736134330.ackdone@bugs.debian.org> <[🔎] 200612220048.20604.elendil@planet.nl>

On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 12:48:20AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> That this is now documented in lilo does not mean it should not be 
> documented in the RN too.

Indeed. I also noticed that during a regular kernel update lilo is not
always called. That's probably a bug in kernel-package even if it is
currently reported against linux-2.6 in #396422.

Jens

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#337779: marked as done (release-notes do not suggest re-running lilo)
  - From: Stephen Gran <sgran@debian.org>

References:
- Bug#337779: marked as done (release-notes do not suggest re-running lilo)
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
- Bug#337779: marked as done (release-notes do not suggest re-running lilo)
  - From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>

Prev by Date: frree sitte!
Next by Date: KRISTIE
Previous by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#337779: marked as done (release-notes do not suggest re-running lilo)
Next by thread: Bug#337779: marked as done (release-notes do not suggest re-running lilo)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread