[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFC: Developer's reference Best Practices for Security review and Design



Il giorno sab, 22/10/2005 alle 23.19 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino
Peña ha scritto:
> I asked a while back to make some things policy, one of those was describing
> how systems users should be created and ask packages to use those instead of
> providing daemons with full root privileges (see #291177). Well, this was
> some time ago, and I'm surprised to see stuff like this: #334616 (a sound
> daemon running with *full* *root* privileges).
> 
> I've decided to write a section for the Developer's Reference called "Best
> practices for security review and design". I think the Audit team (and
> security team) would have less of a job if the maintainers where
> knowledgeable enough to fix security bugs in packages before they are
> uploaded and to detect software which is so bug-ridden with security issues
> that it should never enter the archive.
> 
> The diff is attached (I'm going to commit it right away, I hope the
> Developer's Reference maintainers don't mind) and I'm looking for help to
> proofread it and extend it. If we could write a good section I think we
> should go ahead and mail debian-devel-announce so that people are forewarned
> and don't get bitten by us in the future so much. It would also be useful to
> point maintainers to when they don't understand a bug sent by the audit team.

I think your writing is clear. 

Bye
Stefano

-- 
Stefano Canepa aka sc: sc@linux.it  http://www.stefanocanepa.it
Three great virtues of a programmer: laziness, impatience and hubris.
Le tre grandi virtù di un programmatore: pigrizia, impazienza e
arroganza. (Larry Wall)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: