On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 11:35:42PM +0200, Frans Pop stated: > On Thursday 16 June 2005 21:25, Thaddeus H. Black wrote: > > My question is: is it normal and acceptable in your view to mark > > this kind of document up in debiandoc-sgml, or would it be better to > > mark it up in docbook-sgml/xml? > > The Installation Guide uses docbook-xml, so there is nothing in Debian > that says you cannot do that. > > If you'd like more info on that, feel free to ask. > > I'm not actually very sure of the relative merits of debian-doc versus > docbook-sgml/xml. > > Cheers, > Frans Pop I thought I read somewhere recently that debian-doc did not (currently?) support either images or tables. Is this true? If so, it seems like a less than ideal solution for a documentation format... My $0.02, Raymond -- "Be Nice, or Leave - By Order of the Management" (Sign above door, Black Sheep Inn, Wakefield) GPG Fingerprint: 2E4D 8605 DD48 E80F F893 1C02 B65D 86D9 3B3C 0E03 Encrypted E-mail Preferred Bush-whacked 2004! Try to relax and enjoy the Chaos :-)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature