Re: Release notes errors, part 2
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 01:17:10PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 02 June 2005 07:04, Tapio Lehtonen wrote:
> > Several places has <package/apt/ when the command apt is meant. Should
> > this not be <command/apt/ or something?
>
> Good point. Should be <prgn>.
huh? There is no command apt, only a command apt-get. So I would guess
<prgn/apt-get/ or <package/apt/ are both correct, but not the other way
round?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Reply to: