[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Status of sarge Release Notes?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thanks very much for the info.

On Saturday 04 September 2004 21:54, Denis Barbier wrote:
> this French translation was managed with po-debiandoc for woody.
> In a nl subdirectory, you can run
>   $ debiandoc2pot ../en/release-notes.en.sgml > release-notes.pot

I have Sarge currently, but I see po-debiandoc is available for Sarge :-)

Hmm. The debiandoc2pot command fails. The resulting release-notes.pot only 
contains a default header:
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n"
"POT-Revision-Date: 2004-09-04 22:53+0200\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <EMAIL@ADDRESS>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <LL@li.org>\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=CHARSET\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: ENCODING\n"


I did not check out the complete ddp tree. Just got the files in:
release-notes
release-notes/en
release-notes/fr

This is what I have installed:
ii  gettext        0.14.1-5       GNU Internationalization utilities
ii  libsgmls-perl  1.03ii-30      Perl modules for processing SGML parser outp
ii  sgml-base      1.26           SGML infrastructure and SGML catalog file su
ii  sgml-data      2.0.2          common SGML and XML data
ii  sgmlspl        1.03ii-30      SGMLS-based example Perl script for processi
ii  po-debconf     0.8.12         Manage translated Debconf templates files wi
ii  po-debiandoc   0.7.0          Tools for helping translation of DebianDoc-S
ii  sp             1.3.4-1.2.1-42 James Clark's SGML parsing tools

I also wanted to try on my Woody system, but po-debiandoc seems to be only 
available for sid and sarge (AFAICT apt-get and backports websites don't list 
it).


Any ideas?

TIA,
Frans
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBOjAhgm/Kwh6ICoQRAsoBAJ9SJDuVBVsFuh6s3qkQPKRRiUWOKgCghl6D
wDXquLRO8gsJ648LvmMXFF4=
=tAy2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: