Re: alternate plan for up-to-date docs on www.debian.org
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 04:09:26PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 09:18:46AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > So we could have this (in the long term)
> > 1.- CVS data at Alioth, CVS scripts at gluck (which might or might not be
> > synced manually from Alioth's CVS)
> > 2.- Somebody (in the cvs_doc group) runs a cronjob at gluck that runs 'make
> > all' (gluck is a developer accesible machine so anyone could set this up)
> > and sets PUBLISHDIR to (for example)
> > /home/org/www.debian.org/www/doc/manuals/ (that directory should be rw
> > for the group for obvious reasons) 
> > 3.- www-master, instead of doing 'make all' from the debian-doc CVS tree,
> > retrieves the copy that gluck generated.
> I agree. Is there a real reason to copy pages onto www-master too?
> Does not a link suffice? That could reduce problems.
I mean development pages, of course. If we would consider a
multi-release schema for stable/unstable documentation we probably
should have only links there and maintain all pages (both stable and
unstable ones) on gluck only.
Francesco P. Lovergine