[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

FAQ: Essential vs. Required

As I see people like Richard Braakman asking question [1] on the
difference between "Essential:yes" and "Priority: required" on
d-devel@l.d.o, I decided to add a simple note after the explanation of
"Priority: required" in my "Debian Reference"(CVS).

Since FAQ contains exactly the same contents around here, can I update
FAQ by inserting after line 229 of pkg_basics.sgml?  Can this be phrased
any better?

Here is diff of my "Debian Reference".

Index: system.sgml
RCS file: /cvsroot/qref/qref/en/system.sgml,v
retrieving revision 1.48
diff -u -r1.48 system.sgml
--- system.sgml	1 Jul 2003 16:28:03 -0000	1.48
+++ system.sgml	2 Aug 2003 22:35:42 -0000
@@ -648,6 +648,10 @@
     restore things.  Systems with only the Required packages are probably
     inadequate for most purposes, but they do have enough functionality to
     allow the sysadmin to boot and install more software.
+    <p>Please note that "Priority: required" could be used to mark those 
+    packages which should be essential but can't be marked as 
+    "Essential: yes" in the package description field, e.g., 
+    <package>libc6</package> or <package>mawk</package>.
   <item><strong>Important</strong> packages should be found on any Unix-like
     <p>Other packages without which the system will not run well or be usable 

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200307/msg02062.html

Reply to: