[ This is a reply to a private mail Morten sent me. [ He has consented to a public reply. On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 05:03:03PM +0200, Morten Hustveit wrote: > Ben Armstrong points out that the existing documentation is maintained > satisfactory. Come to think about it, i fully agree. The wiki could work > like a directory with notes about Debian-specific behaviour, rather than > acting like a single source of information, and provide a cache similar to > that of Google. Following a design goal like that, though, would leave most > of the material at wiki.debian.net outside the scope, and require a > completely different engine. Yes, the comment from Ben nudged me to think more about the topic. Here is what I came up with: === Vision = ''Providing SourceForge-like infrastructure based on a wiki-like structure'' Components: * SourceCode * Dokumentation * VersionControl * ReleaseMechanisms * TestFramework * BugTracking === Implementation = Necessary Modifications: * complete VersionControl with e.g. {{cvs}} * Export-/¦Importpossibilities for bigger changes in the source * Handling of bigger amounts of <nowiki> data ** SyntaxHighlighting plus WikiElements in the source * support deep hierarchies ** flexible resolution of references to other pages * improved Interfaces to enter content. e.g. MailToWikiInterface This is a translation from a german Wiki, where I tried to get a first feedback. <http://www.wikiservice.at/dse/wiki.cgi?WikiAlsIDE> The usemod-wiki entered unstable a few days ago and seems to provide a good base for experiments. Regards, David -- Signaturen sind wie Frauen. Man findet selten eine Vernuenftige -- gesehen in at.linux Signaturen sind wie Frauen. Hat man einmal eine Vernuenftige gefunden gibt man sie nicht wieder her. -- Hubert Partl
Attachment:
pgpcnUq9UTh0Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature