Re: Fwd: Re: Progeny Debian Manual Project
On Wednesday, April 3, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 09:08:09PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> Any opinion?
>
> PS: I like debiandoc-sgml for this type of document for continuity and
> ease of management but no way to include graphics at this moment :(
Debiandoc was a great innovation when Ardo (& others) put it together.. But I
would STRONGLY advise against starting a new doc project based on debiandoc. In
a nutshell, debiandoc-sgml doesn't (IMO) possess sufficient complexity to
represent the kind of info you're talking about.
Furthermore, the docbook --> debiandoc conversion can easily be done, but the
reverse (one to many) would create many headaches.
If my $0.02 mean anything, I'd suggest you convert the original docs to
docbook-xml. It'll save much effort in the long run.
Cheers,
Mark
_____________________________________
Mark Johnson <mark@duke.edu>
Debian SGML <mrj@debian.org>
Home Page: <http://dulug.duke.edu/~mark/>
GPG fp: 50DF A22D 5119 3485 E9E4 89B2 BCBC B2C8 2BE2 FE81
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: