[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Wrong path for RTF mapping



Hi.

I add debian-doc ML at Cc: of this mail.

This bug reported against that sgml-tools V1 can not handle
the debiandoc dtd documents.

In <19991215110914.A23867@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>,
 at Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:09:14 +0100,
  on Subject: Re: Wrong path for RTF mapping,
   Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE> writes:

joey> reopen 36944
joey> severity 36944 normal
joey> thanks
joey> 
joey> Taketoshi Sano wrote:
joey> > Hi.
joey> > 
joey> > this sgml-tools is dead branch, and only maintained for
joey> > backward compatibility to linuxdoc dtd.
joey> > 
joey> > I don't want to enhance this sgml-tools to support debiandoc dtd,
joey> > because I wish to work on enhancement of i18n (esp. japanese) support
joey> > in debiandoc-sgml and jade.
joey> > 
joey> > If you wish to handle the debiandoc dtd documents,
joey> > you should use the debiandoc-sgml package.
joey> 
joey> I'm sorry, but shipping buggy software is not our job, nor is it
joey> closing bugs that aren't fixed.

Then, If a C compiler can not compile the C++ source code, 
do you think it is buggy ? I don't think so.

joey> >  /usr/bin/debiandoc2latex2e is the convert command to get 
joey> > the result in latex2e format.
joey> 
joey> If I remember where I needed it I'll try this one.

I think the DebianDoc DTD is different one from LinuxDoc DTD,
if this sgml-tools V1 was buggy because it can not
handle the DebianDoc DTD, then sgmltools-2 and jade should be marked
as well as sgml-tools V1, because they can not handle LinuxDoc DTD.

I think this bug report should be forwarded, but since the upstream
does not have interest on enhancement of sgml-tools v1 because he
tried to develop sgmltool-2, and sgmltools-2 can not handle the linuxdoc
dtd, and LDP still uses linuxdoc DTD, so we Debian should provide this
old sgml-tools v1 package.

So I set severity wishlist for this report, and others similar to this.
If just to add symlink is enough to support debiandoc dtd, I will do it,
but I don't think so,,,

Comment from anyone ? Please.

-- 
  Taketoshi Sano: <sano@debian.org>,<sano@debian.or.jp>,<kgh12351@nifty.ne.jp>


Reply to: