Re: Installing Debian Linux 2.0 For x86 - Copyright mistake
I would rather see a blanket acknowledgment, like seen
in many ads:
All trade marks are property of their owners.
If we specifically mention something that should be
selected on ethical grounds, e.g. fsf. If Partition
Magic does not get mentioned while clearly being
useful why should MS get extra mention.
Blanket ack would also be less maintenance trouble.
p.s. I spent some of the weekend reading the install
doc, more comments later
Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jan 1999 18:00:41 -0000, "David Leadbeater" <email@example.com> said:
> > In the 23 June 1998 edition of your installing debian document. You
> > say that WinModem is a trademark of microsoft but I think it is a
> > trademark of US Robotics/3Com.
> Thanks! It's USR, yes. Fixed in CVS. Can you scan for other
> instances where I use but don't attribute Trademarked terms? This
> would really help me out.