Re: Re^4: document registration policy needing to be written
Marco.Budde@hqsys.antar.com (Marco Budde) writes:
> APH> * doc-base uses RFC-822 style field format; dhelp uses pseudo-SGML. I
> APH> am sure that doc-base's format is superior.
> I#m not, but if the other like the doc-base format, I don#t have a
> problem to use it. Could you post a sample doc-base entry, please.
Surely. Here's the file for doc-base itself. More complex than most.
Title: Debian doc-base Manual
Author: Christian Schwarz
Abstract: This manual describes what doc-base is and how it can be used to
manage online manuals on Debian systems.
> APH> * doc-base tries to be a generic document registration format; dhelp
> APH> tries to just register and organize HTML files.
> That#s right, we need a "Fileformat: " line.
It is already there! See above.
> I think, "Fileformat: HTML" should optional (not needed), because HTML
> will be our standard format. All packages should ship HTML and SGML if
> possible (and if possible in two packages). If there#s no SGML/TEXI file,
> for example PS should be shiped.
Blech. Disagree. Arguably, flat text files are our standard format;
a close runner up being debiandoc-sgml. Anyhow, if you want to
accomodate lazy pgk maintainers, it would be bettter to try to
autoguess the format based on either the file magic (i.e., 'file') or
Well. Anyhow, I feel like I'm slowly bring Marco around here.
Marco, please read the documentation file provided with doc-base too,
if you can get a chance.
.....A. P. Harris...apharris@onShore.com...<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org