Fabian Grünbichler <debian@fabian.gruenbichler.email> writes: > I would like to introduce new packages for (Tier 3) BPF targets > `bpfeb-unknown-none` and `bpfel-unknown-none`, to support use cases like aya-rs > properly. Are those triplets registered? Several packages build BPF targets now, but I'm not sure there is agreement on the triplets. Getting some consistency on this would be nice. In 'nsd' I chose /usr/lib/bpf, see: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2025/09/msg00143.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2025/09/msg00150.html According to Matthias Klose, the GNU toolchain uses the 'bpf' triplet, which feels like a good argument to me. Little endian seems to be the default, according to: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-15.2.0/gcc/eBPF-Options.html So maybe 'bpf' and 'bpfeb'? Also I wonder about the -mxbpf flavor, is it really ISA compatible? Maybe that should use 'xbpf' or 'bpfx' (and 'xbpfeb' 'bpfxeb'...) /Simon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature