Re: Bits from the DPL
Hi Charles,
Am Mon, Oct 06, 2025 at 02:18:10PM +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy:
> > On 2025-10-05 08:51:02 +0200 (+0200), Andreas Tille wrote:
> > [...]
> > The 48-hour timeframe mentioned is not a hard rule but an example I came
> > accross of what might be considered "speedy" action
>
> Actually, copyright violations are not the only kind of reasons for needing to
> remove a package as fast as possible. I think that it would be good to have at
> least a risk assessment and a plan. Not sure if it was the intention of
> Andreas, but it would make sense to me that our delegations make sure we have a
> common understanding of who is in charge of what in case of emergency.
Thank you for wrapping my idea in better words - that's exactly what I
had in mind. Defining responsibilities and having a clear plan for
removals would indeed help us handle such situations more effectively.
Actually, my initial wording may have shifted the focus into an
unfortunate direction. What I really want to discuss is whether package
removals - both the routine ones we already handle regularly and
possible "emergency" cases - should explicitly fall under the
responsibility of the Archive Operations Team. I'd very much appreciate
feedback on whether that seems sensible.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
Reply to: