Quoting Alexander Kjäll (2025-09-21 12:23:01) > > > > And to spell it out explicitly we would prefer if you changed from > > A) > > Upload $package + its missing dependencies to unstable > > > > (Causing unstable containing broken packages for $random, posibly very > > very long time)) > > > > to > > > > B) > > * Upload $package + its missing dependencies to experimental > > * Wait for all parts to pass through NEW > > * Re-upload everything to unstable > > > > cu Andreas > > Sure. > > This sounds to me like it should be a Debian wide policy. If this is a > problem, why are uploads to unstable that need to go through NEW even > allowed in the first place? Debian Policy § 5.8.1 defines experimental as suitable for packages not "ready to be a part of the other parts of the Debian distribution tree". Not all uploads via NEW have not-already-in-unstable dependencies, so NEW != experimental. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature