[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Bug#1095077: I intend to package directxshadercompiler
To
:
1095077@bugs.debian.org
Cc
:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject
: Bug#1095077: I intend to package directxshadercompiler
From
: Antoine Lassagne <
antoinelassagne@gmail.com
>
Date
: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 12:12:50 +0200
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
CAFU-3_MytGcG4qxM7LuN+fbcY_z6pM_9aKrCK-X2W37bA--RMQ@mail.gmail.com
>
Reply-to
: Antoine Lassagne <
antoinelassagne@gmail.com
>,
1095077@bugs.debian.org
References
: <Z6Dcq5sqOgHsI4HS@remnant.pseudorandom.co.uk>
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #1095077
Owner: "
antoine.lassagne@canonical.com
" <
antoinelassagne@gmail.com
>
X-Debbugs-Cc:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
I will package this one according to what lunarG did in their own self-hosted packaging.
Reply to:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Antoine Lassagne (on-list)
Antoine Lassagne (off-list)
Prev by Date:
Bug#947407: I intend to package vulkancapsviewer
Next by Date:
Re: why package Signal in Debian? (was Re: Bug#1113746: ITP: node-noop6 -- No operation as a module using an arrow function)
Previous by thread:
Bug#947407: I intend to package vulkancapsviewer
Next by thread:
Any news about telegram-desktop (was: Re: Can anyone help with telegram-desktop?)
Index(es):
Date
Thread