On Thursday, July 17, 2025 11:12:14 AM Mountain Standard Time Soren Stoutner wrote: > the apparent lack of anyone having pointed to any specific content sill > remaining that is unacceptable for Debian. After writing this line, I read further in the thread where specific entries were identified. The response of the maintainer expressing willingness to accept a MR removing them or otherwise consider discussion of their removal indicates to me that the primary point of my previous email was valid, which is that instead of removing the entire package it would be more valuable for Debian to develop an explicit set of standards for what constitutes acceptable content and then remove individual items from the package that do not meet those standards. Developing consensus for such a standard is non-trivial work, as can be easily seen in the discussion so far. But it is important work and no DD should feel they can impose their personal opinions on what this standard should be until the project as a whole has come to a consensus. -- Soren Stoutner soren@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.