Re: Renovating debbugs (was Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian?)
On Sun, 01 Jun 2025, Antonio Terceiro wrote:n
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2025 at 09:54:09AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 May 2025, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:n
> > > I would assume Debbugs might evolve without you having to personally
> > > do all the improvements, if you allow improvements done by others
> > > flow in. As an example, I have had
> > > https://salsa.debian.org/debbugs-team/debbugs/-/merge_requests/6
> > > open for 4 years now.
> >
> > That's not an MR that I'll apply, because the actual version that
> > debbugs runs is at https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/debbugs/
>
> FWIW the actual/working repository URL is
> https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/debbugs.git
Sorry, I typoed. The above line should read
https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/debian/, which is a checked-out
version of the debian branch of https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/debbugs.git
That said, we probably should point at the salsa repo too, since it's
way more friendly than a random directory.
--
Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com
We want 6. 6 is the 1.
-- "The Prisoner (2009 Miniseries)" _Checkmate_
Reply to: