On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 10:04:01PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > does it make sense to work in debian/latest and only last before pushing for > review create another branch next/debian/latest? I'd always intuitively work > in next/debian/latest directly. I appreciate and applaus Otto's posts too, but can we please agree on debian/unstable, debian/experimental, debian/trixie, ... as our *default*? while still "allowing" debian/latest and and also debian/3.11 and debian/3.12 and debian/foo and debian/bar? I've come to think that dep-14 should recommend debian/* and more specifically debian/unstable for uploads to unstable. (And since this is a rather newer fallout from http://ppc64el.reproduce.debian.net/ I thought I would share.) -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ An app is just a website wrapped in enough IP so that the company that made it can send you to prison if you dare to modify it so that it serves your interests rather than theirs. Cory Doctorow, https://pluralistic.net/2025/02/26/ursula-franklin/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature