Re: Renovating debbugs (was Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian?)

To: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Renovating debbugs (was Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian?)
From: "Jonathan Dowland" <jmtd@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 12:11:38 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] DA7QYED5OQ60.KDUBP9AMCOSR@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] cc81c2c0-7d21-46c6-9e11-7b63d992a084@khalifa.ws>
References: <[🔎] 6af44c79-1388-f4ff-0cd9-834ec53f8181@free.fr> <[🔎] cc81c2c0-7d21-46c6-9e11-7b63d992a084@khalifa.ws>

On Tue May 27, 2025 at 7:30 PM BST, Ahmad Khalifa wrote:

0. keep all the e-mail features it currently offers
IMHO, this is a security flaw, not a feature. I hear that everyone lovesit, so at least the emails should be authenticated somehow (@debian onlymaybe? one-time register-confirm emails?).

Can you expand on why you think manipulating bugs by mail is a securityflaw?


--
Please do not CC me for listmail.

👱🏻	Jonathan Dowland
✎	 jmtd@debian.org
🔗	https://jmtd.net

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Renovating debbugs (was Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian?)
  - From: Ahmad Khalifa <ahmad@khalifa.ws>

References:
- Renovating debbugs (was Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian?)
  - From: Julien Plissonneau Duquène <sre4ever@free.fr>
- Re: Renovating debbugs (was Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian?)
  - From: Ahmad Khalifa <ahmad@khalifa.ws>

Prev by Date: Re: Dependency merging in APT
Next by Date: Re: Renovating debbugs (was Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian?)
Previous by thread: Re: Renovating debbugs (was Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian?)
Next by thread: Re: Renovating debbugs (was Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread