Re: Exploring forgejo as alternative to salsa ? (Was Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge?)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Exploring forgejo as alternative to salsa ? (Was Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge?)
From: Jan Claeys <lists@janc.be>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 20:03:33 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] aad7354711b2e8ee68d39f0c45ec314f0c2148e9.camel@janc.be>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] swo84t.2vfclf4nvgjnc@riseup.net>
References: <[🔎] 7e26c876-ed5d-4e16-867a-37011e5b48f6@riseup.net> <[🔎] 87h61clkjv.fsf@ganneff.de> <[🔎] swo84t.2vfclf4nvgjnc@riseup.net>

On Thu, 2025-05-22 at 18:10 +0200, Matthias Geiger wrote:
> Nice to have the raw numbers; > 16k users is indeed a lot.
> The most recent number I could find for codeberg was 11k users and
> 12k repos.

FWIW: based on the "Explore" pages there seem to be ~161k repositories,
~157k users and ~11k organisations (~teams) on Codeberg now.

-- 
Jan Claeys

(please don't CC me when replying to the list)

Reply to:

References:
- Exploring forgejo as alternative to salsa ? (Was Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge?)
  - From: Matthias Geiger <werdahias@riseup.net>
- Re: Exploring forgejo as alternative to salsa ? (Was Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge?)
  - From: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
- Re: Exploring forgejo as alternative to salsa ? (Was Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge?)
  - From: Matthias Geiger <werdahias@riseup.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Exploring forgejo as alternative to salsa ? (Was Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge?)
Next by Date: Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian?
Previous by thread: Re: Exploring forgejo as alternative to salsa ? (Was Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge?)
Next by thread: Re: Exploring forgejo as alternative to salsa ? (Was Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread