Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL)
> On Thu 06 Mar 2025 at 01:21pm +09, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> > Around 12 years ago, I proposed a peer-review system to increase the quality of
> > the packages in the NEW queue. https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReview
Le Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 05:41:14PM +0800, Sean Whitton a écrit :
>
> If someone wants to set this up in a way that doesn't increase ftp team
> workload but means packages have to be reject'd less often -- by all
> means.
Thanks Sean, Thorsten and everybody else for the positive feedback.
I have prepared a stub for a "Gateway to NEW" on Salsa:
https://salsa.debian.org/newgateway-team
I added `Debian` as a team member.
I am under the impression that forking repositories will not be necessary: if
we provide CI pipeline packages like the salsa-ci project, and smart ways to
turn them on and off, then people can run their tests in their own
repositories. I have some new r-cran-* packages to prepare next week; I will
use them as a proof of principle. Everybody is welcome to be faster than me to
test the idea.
I am not entirely sure on where to continue the discussion, but maybe we can
try to leverage Salsa as much as possible for that as well?
Have a nice day,
Charles
--
Charles Plessy Nagahama, Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
Debian Med packaging team http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tooting from home https://framapiaf.org/@charles_plessy
- You do not have my permission to use this email to train an AI -
Reply to: