Re: Misconfigured bookworm upgrades
On 2025-02-28 20:24:27 +0900, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2/28/25 19:57, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> > But seeing two users who seem to have their systems configured this way
> > makes me wonder what's going on. Does anyone know of documentation
> > somewhere that recommends configuring stable systems this way?
>
> What is weird is that both have pin priority 500, so I wonder why the newer
> version isn't selected.
>
> The package in stable is also from a point release, so point releases are
> available as well. My initial suspicion was "CD-ROM plus security updates",
> which I'd find is a somewhat understandable combination that is also broken.
>
> I'd probably reassign to apt :>
No, according to
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1098272
"apt" is fine:
I worked around it by just doing 'apt install openssh-server', but that
doesn't scale.
I'd say that this is rather a bug in unattended-upgrades.
BTW, the user still has "Debian Release: 12.6", while the current
point release is 12.9.
Also, the user says: "the unattended upgrader, which is configured to
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
only install security updates".
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Could this be a misconfiguration of unattended-upgrade?
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Pascaline project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
Reply to: