Re: Filesystem snapshotting in dpkg (was Re: A 2025 NewYear present: make dpkg --force-unsafe-io the default?)
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Filesystem snapshotting in dpkg (was Re: A 2025 NewYear present: make dpkg --force-unsafe-io the default?)
- From: Christian Kastner <ckk@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 21:08:03 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] c6d7a4f6-0b0d-40e7-bd1e-04f436da4055@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <Z3AJYN8pLREB5ALn@thunder.hadrons.org>
- References: <3b77e59a-ea95-40ed-b603-f4af66497e72@tls.msk.ru> <6c544834-3e4e-4317-a42a-b4c901c0e981@debian.org> <20241227091622.GA4038545@debian.org> <0fc78895-30a9-4d90-abaf-602fd944b5ba@bayindir.org> <Z26ewycRXLBjZlpR@gpm.stappers.nl> <17643b68-31d7-4a2e-a9ee-74ff1e1dae45@kamens.us> <Z3AJYN8pLREB5ALn@thunder.hadrons.org>
Hi,
I have not been monitoring this thread but this new Subject popped up,
and then something came to mind:
On 2024-12-28 15:21, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Port-specific or hardware specific optimizations might make sense in
> dpkg, but that depends on the type, semantics, testability and
> intrusiveness, among other things.
>
> In this case (filesystem snapshotting), I do think dpkg is (currently at
> least) really the wrong place, for at least the following reasons:
I read somewhere that Fedora can do full rollbacks because the make use
of "ostree". See [1] for example. We have ostree in our Archive [2].
I'm not familiar with it yet, but had this bookmarked as something to
look into at some point.
Best,
Christian
[1]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-silverblue/updates-upgrades-rollbacks/
[2]: https://packages.debian.org/sid/ostree
Reply to: