Re: Packages with a history of security issues and whose packaged version is not up to date

To: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Packages with a history of security issues and whose packaged version is not up to date
From: "Jonathan Dowland" <jmtd@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 10:11:07 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] D7S35Y48STNX.1LNUDZPIXOIN1@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 381a21b2-9b7a-46a7-9ac9-556a02f084c8@debian.org>
References: <[🔎] Z65GJs21cJkGUwoC@voleno> <[🔎] 381a21b2-9b7a-46a7-9ac9-556a02f084c8@debian.org>

On Thu Feb 13, 2025 at 8:57 PM GMT, Paul Gevers wrote:

You might also want to somehow take activity on the package intoaccount.

Absolutely. E.g. the new OpenJDK 11 package came out a week ago. Itwould be interesting to see which packages in the list have a muchlarger gap, such as years.



--
Please do not CC me for listmail.

👱🏻	Jonathan Dowland
✎	 jmtd@debian.org
🔗	https://jmtd.net

Reply to:

References:
- Packages with a history of security issues and whose packaged version is not up to date
  - From: Santiago Ruano Rincón <santiagorr@riseup.net>
- Re: Packages with a history of security issues and whose packaged version is not up to date
  - From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: sbuild and dpkg-checkbuilddeps
Next by Date: Re: Packages with a history of security issues and whose packaged version is not up to date
Previous by thread: Re: Packages with a history of security issues and whose packaged version is not up to date
Next by thread: Re: Packages with a history of security issues and whose packaged version is not up to date
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread