Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections?

To: "Debian Developers" <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections?
From: "Andrej Shadura" <andrew@shadura.me>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 14:00:04 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] ec085391-2b70-41df-b5a9-4a40f2f49464@app.fastmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAOU6tADb2MB_VPWToVhb19QHdU=s=isVT2w9xqGSMPcue7yJdA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CAOU6tADb2MB_VPWToVhb19QHdU=s=isVT2w9xqGSMPcue7yJdA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On Fri, 24 Jan 2025, at 02:06, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Why does the majority of Debian packages still use 'master' or
> 'debian/master' branch as the main development branch?

I’ve not really used debian/master or debian/latest because it does not seem to convey what I’m intending by the branch name. I’m uploading to unstable, hence it’s debian/unstable for me, not anything else. I don’t intend to change this habit.

-- 
Cheers,
  Andrej

Reply to:

References:
- DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections?
  - From: Otto Kekäläinen <otto@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian
Next by Date: Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian
Previous by thread: Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections?
Next by thread: Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread