Re: Is HURD's lack of HOST_NAME_MAX and PATH_MAX a good architectural approach
Sam Hartman, le lun. 20 janv. 2025 15:48:00 -0700, a ecrit:
> My restatement is that it's possible to create paths where the full path
> name is longer than PATH_MAX.
>
> I guess a better way to look at this would be that paths beyond PATH_MAX
> may break.
And unfortunately, code that just uses PATH_MAX as allocation size most
often do not really take care about this case, and then get possibly
vulnerable.
Samuel
Reply to: