Re: criteria for acceptable languages for central QA tools in Debian (was: Re: coordination between lintian/piuparts/adequate)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: criteria for acceptable languages for central QA tools in Debian (was: Re: coordination between lintian/piuparts/adequate)
From: Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 21:59:59 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 10590674.qUNvkh4Gvn@soren-desktop>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] D6XV6ZXQ1VE2.1ERXBQG1E3N7L@debian.org>
References: <D563NIWIQDZ2.3TDK6BTT7U22T@debian.org> <[🔎] Z3-W4fwimW5_a1a7@layer-acht.org> <[🔎] D6XV6ZXQ1VE2.1ERXBQG1E3N7L@debian.org>

On Thursday, January 9, 2025 2:36:21 PM MST Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> if you care about adequate, *please* tone down the negativity and file actual
> bugs with specifics

+1

-- 
Soren Stoutner
soren@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: criteria for acceptable languages for central QA tools in Debian (was: Re: coordination between lintian/piuparts/adequate)
  - From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Re: criteria for acceptable languages for central QA tools in Debian (was: Re: coordination between lintian/piuparts/adequate)
  - From: "Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas" <sez@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze
Next by Date: Re: getting ziggy with it
Previous by thread: Re: criteria for acceptable languages for central QA tools in Debian (was: Re: coordination between lintian/piuparts/adequate)
Next by thread: Re: criteria for acceptable languages for central QA tools in Debian (was: Re: coordination between lintian/piuparts/adequate)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread