[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline



On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 10:01:30AM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Steve" == Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:

>     >> At one level, krb5-multidev only has an rdep of 5, but I suspect
>     >> the rdep count for libkrb5-dev is somewhat larger:-) I don't know
>     >> how many packages would be removed from the transition if we
>     >> decide most of the krb5 libraries do not need to transition.

>     Steve> If we determined only libkdb5-10 and libgssrpc4 were
>     Steve> affected, that does significantly reduce the number of
>     Steve> packages needing to be rebuilt because of krb5, though maybe
>     Steve> most of those packages also depend on other libraries that
>     Steve> are transitioning.

> I confirm libgssrpc is also affected.
> (It would be nice to get rid of libgssrpc entirely and just use the
> system tli-rpc).
> My bad; I was so focused on time_t I forgot about timeval.

> However, I do think that we're limited only to libkdb5-10 and
> libgssrpc4.
> I would prefer not to change the abi of the other libraries, especially
> libkrb5, libk5crypto3 and libgssapi-krb5-2.

> What can I do to help facilitate that?

I've updated the override list here.

Reduces the count of revdeps to be rebuilt from 5450+168 to 5439+168.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                   https://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com                                     vorlon@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: