Re: Proposal: Optional `Priority: optional` and changed `Section` fall-back
Hi,
since feedback was requested the normally unwanted +1 ...
Am Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 09:29:26AM +0000 schrieb Holger Levsen:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 09:50:17AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > both sound good (dropping mandatory priority is nice and consistent,
> > fixing unknown section behaviour too), thanks!
>
> indeed! thank you both!
Sounds good to me
> > ideally these changes would be in dpkg in trixie, but maintainers would
> > start dropping priority fields *after* trixie so that for backports we
> > woudn't need to add it back en masse.
>
> indeed.
ACK
Thank you for the suggestion, Niels
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
Reply to: