[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: criteria for acceptable languages for central QA tools in Debian (was: Re: coordination between lintian/piuparts/adequate)



On Tue Dec 17, 2024 at 8:35 PM GMT, Bill Allombert wrote:
The actual perl problem is that, since perl is very strict about
backward compatibility, perl scripts written 10 or 20 years ago still
work without requiring maintainance, hence they may appear to be
abandonned. Rewriting such software in a language that require yearly maintainance
does not simplify maintainance in the long run, quite the opposite.

FWIW, a Ruby script I wrote to help me triage DSAs¹ is approaching its 20th birthday, I'm happy to report Ruby appears to have avoided any disasters like Python's 2→3 transition.

[1] https://jmtd.net/dsafilter/


--
Please do not CC me for listmail.

👱🏻	Jonathan Dowland
✎	 jmtd@debian.org
🔗	https://jmtd.net


Reply to: