Results (Re: DEP-0, DEP0 or DEP 0?)

[Otto Kekäläinen <otto@debian.org>]

[...]
> Can we agree on calling Debian Enhancement Proposals DEP-N with a dash?
>
> My eyes get sore when looking at commit messages like these:
>
> * cd4d154 DEP 15: initial draft
> * f54478c DEP8: Fix link to current specification
> * 1f20e9d DEP-14: Version -> refname mangling: Escape dots

Results today:

    https://salsa.debian.org/dep-team/deps/-/merge_requests/15
    Unify DEP spelling with a space instead of dash (e.g. "DEP0")
    = +7 (-0)

    https://salsa.debian.org/dep-team/deps/-/merge_requests/14
    Unify DEP spelling with a space instead of dash (e.g. "DEP 0")
    = +2 (-7)

    https://salsa.debian.org/dep-team/deps/-/merge_requests/13
    Unify DEP spelling with a dash instead of a space (e.g. "DEP-0")
    = +22 (-4)

I changed my personal preference from DEP-0 to DEP0 as I now consider
DEP0 the best option based as I have seen so much of RFC822, dep3,
dep8 and DEP14 in use in many places. However, that +22 for DEP-0 is
pretty large majority so I have to conclude it won.