Re: Suitability of Rust for all architectures? [WAS Re: Rustc unsoundness on i386]

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Suitability of Rust for *all* architectures? [WAS Re: Rustc unsoundness on i386]
From: Jeremy Bícha <jeremy.bicha@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:47:09 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] CAD+GYvx-3Ej4Lq0xPetXn=phSzzopcBPiy1_0z45kdfrZQ+_=w@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 3a280920-c5b5-46b9-8b4a-7f435af383c8@debian.org>
References: <[🔎] 20241121210134.GA1768236@debian.org> <[🔎] vhqam3$cj2$1@ciao.gmane.io> <[🔎] 20241122173450.GA342667@debian.org> <[🔎] 173229484266.3564619.10724601727595109396@cairon.jones.dk> <[🔎] xno2m6ssedpyoptomgzrzvfhb5clf4mhezjm5y4rzmwfxwhdpl@amdw25husvok> <[🔎] 173236379512.3564619.10472479530663386649@cairon.jones.dk> <[🔎] d8b5003f-8543-47b3-84a5-ade34c831655@app.fastmail.com> <[🔎] Z0Ie8FCGM3ltyyej@belkar.wrar.name> <[🔎] Z0Ing7XKiqX3zD_x@einval.com> <[🔎] Z0LVnNdF2YOPduHs@belkar.wrar.name> <[🔎] Z0NSuqzc3ZtE2sFv@einval.com> <[🔎] 3a280920-c5b5-46b9-8b4a-7f435af383c8@debian.org>

On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 12:51 PM Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> wrote:
> [Release Team hat on] I would take consensus for a decision on the topic.

If the excess precision issue goes away by bumping the i386 baseline,
that would make my life easier.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha

Reply to:

References:
- Moving apt (and hence bootstraps) from GnuPG to Sequioa (via gpgv-sq)
  - From: Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org>
- Re: Moving apt (and hence bootstraps) from GnuPG to Sequioa (via gpgv-sq)
  - From: Sune Vuorela <nospam@vuorela.dk>
- Re: Moving apt (and hence bootstraps) from GnuPG to Sequioa (via gpgv-sq)
  - From: Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org>
- Re: Moving apt (and hence bootstraps) from GnuPG to Sequioa (via gpgv-sq)
  - From: Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk>
- Re: Moving apt (and hence bootstraps) from GnuPG to Sequioa (via gpgv-sq)
  - From: Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org>
- Re: Moving apt (and hence bootstraps) from GnuPG to Sequioa (via gpgv-sq)
  - From: Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk>
- Rustc unsoundness on i386
  - From: Fabian Grünbichler <debian@fabian.gruenbichler.email>
- Re: Rustc unsoundness on i386
  - From: Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org>
- Suitability of Rust for *all* architectures? [WAS Re: Rustc unsoundness on i386]
  - From: "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com>
- Re: Suitability of Rust for *all* architectures? [WAS Re: Rustc unsoundness on i386]
  - From: Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org>
- Re: Suitability of Rust for *all* architectures? [WAS Re: Rustc unsoundness on i386]
  - From: "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com>
- Re: Suitability of Rust for *all* architectures? [WAS Re: Rustc unsoundness on i386]
  - From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Suitability of Rust for *all* architectures? [WAS Re: Rustc unsoundness on i386]
Next by Date: Re: [Summary]: Supporting alternative zlib implementations
Previous by thread: Re: Suitability of Rust for *all* architectures? [WAS Re: Rustc unsoundness on i386]
Next by thread: Re: Suitability of Rust for *all* architectures? [WAS Re: Rustc unsoundness on i386]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: Suitability of Rust for *all* architectures? [WAS Re: Rustc unsoundness on i386]

Re: Suitability of Rust for all architectures? [WAS Re: Rustc unsoundness on i386]