Re: signify and signify-openbsd names
On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:31:33 +0900, Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org>
wrote:
>On 10/7/24 16:58, Marc Haber wrote:
>> I also see trouble in the archive when we have old signify in older
>> distributions and new signify in unstable and testing. Without having
>> any technical justification for that, I would probably go ahead to
>> rename signify to signify-mail, leaving signify-openbsd named that way
>> until the old signify source package has aged out of the archive
>> completely and was moved to archive.d.o.
>
>The correct approach is one release with a transitional package, pulling
>the new package in, and one release with the name unused (so the
>transitional package is listed in Obsolete/Local).
I was actually talking about source package names, not binary.
Greetings
Marc
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Rhein-Neckar, DE | Beginning of Wisdom " |
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Reply to: