Re: Intent to MBF: move from fuse to fuse3
Hi,
* László Böszörményi (GCS) <gcs@debian.org> [240825 18:30]:
> Thanks for adding me, I can't follow -devel.
Sorry for not thinking about that earlier
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 11:24 PM Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org> wrote:
> > Updated MBF text proposal:
> [...]
> > Does that sound good?
> This sounds right to me, except that the fuse package should be
> removed in the Trixie release already. It was obsoleted more than five
> years ago and it's time to move on.
Yeah, I agree. Do you want to upload a new src:fuse package dropping
the fuse binary package?
fuse3 already Provides: fuse, so that should be fine.
> The libfuse2 package might remain,
> but dependent packages had enough time to migrate already.
> Unfortunately it is known in other distributions as well [1] that for
> some reason (laziness probably) projects don't migrate to fuse3.
Ack, for now libfuse2(-dev) should stay :-(
> Regards,
> Laszlo/GCS
Best,
Chris
> [1] https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/150502#issuecomment-2017295190
Reply to: