Re: autoconf 2.72 to unstable?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: autoconf 2.72 to unstable?
From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@bebt.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 18:24:01 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] ZmxuoQ8zeFong1SM@argenau.bebt.de>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] db87fcac057fcd6436b3c651a0183ca5@phys.ethz.ch>
References: <[🔎] 31125b853b67fce56fdf8e4585801b6d@phys.ethz.ch> <[🔎] ZmvZqvijfJkRdGU9@ramacher.at> <[🔎] db87fcac057fcd6436b3c651a0183ca5@phys.ethz.ch>

On 2024-06-14 Gürkan Myczko <gurkan@phys.ethz.ch> wrote:
[...]
> Have never done mass bug filings, any easy way, preferably something copy
> pastable,
> non-interactive.

Hej,

How about mass-bug(1) in devscripts?

cu Andreas

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: autoconf 2.72 to unstable?
  - From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>

References:
- autoconf 2.72 to unstable?
  - From: Gürkan Myczko <gurkan@phys.ethz.ch>
- Re: autoconf 2.72 to unstable?
  - From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Re: autoconf 2.72 to unstable?
  - From: Gürkan Myczko <gurkan@phys.ethz.ch>

Prev by Date: Re: File descriptor hard limit is now bumped to the kernel max
Next by Date: Re: About i386 support
Previous by thread: Re: autoconf 2.72 to unstable?
Next by thread: Re: autoconf 2.72 to unstable?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread