[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Fwd: Fwd: Requesting for setting up loong64 buildds (Server machines) for Official port--Update



Hi maintainers,

Sorry to ping and bother you again.



-------- 转发的消息 --------
主题: Fwd: Requesting for setting up loong64 buildds (Server machines) for Official port-Update
日期: Tue, 28 May 2024 17:00:41 +0800
发件人: zhangdandan <zhangdandan@loongson.cn>
收件人: debian-admin@lists.debian.org
抄送: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>, pabs@debian.org

Hi DSA team,

Requesting for setting up loong64 buildds (Server machines) for Official port, I need to update the status of loong64 port.
Based on the content of the last email, I need to update the following,
- About Debian debci
We have prepared 2 debci machines (LoongArch Server machines) for debci team.
Please see https://lists.debian.org/debian-ci/2024/05/msg00012.html.
Currently loong64 was included in debci. Thanks elbrus, sincerely.
The build status of debci, can be found at https://ci.debian.net/user/britney/jobs?package=&trigger=&suite%5B%5D=unstable&arch%5B%5D=loong64.

- About Hardware Qualification
Grow the hardware ecosystem until it satisfies the requirements for an official port.
Document (with a wiki page named after the port below HardwareQualification) how the current/planned hardware for the port meets these requirements.
Currently I have added Hardware Qualification page for loong64. Thanks pabs reminder, sincerely.
Please see https://wiki.debian.org/HardwareQualification/loong64.

- About porterbox
We have sent a LoongArch Server machine (3C5000 7A2000) to Salzburg as a porter box for loong64.
The Server machine will be hosted in Salzburg, Austria at Conova and set up by glaubitz@d.o.

- About buildd-dsa
I hope that I could get guidance or suggestions from Debian DSA team.
We have prepared 4 ~ 6 LoongArch Server machines.
According to the needs expressed by the DSA, we can mail LoongArch Server machines (used as Official Port buildds) to different locations.

Your opinions are welcome.

Thanks,
Dandan Zhang


-------- 转发的消息 --------
主题: Requesting for setting up loong64 buildds (Server machines) for Official port
日期: Thu, 16 May 2024 21:50:19 +0800
发件人: zhangdandan <zhangdandan@loongson.cn>
收件人: debian-admin@lists.debian.org
抄送: zhangdandan@loongson.cn


Hi DSA team,

I am continuously porting loong64 to the Debian community.
It's my pleasure to communicate and solve problems with DSA team.

When I requested that the loong64 port could be included amongst the Official ports,  I got from debian IRC that maybe I need to set up servers machines(buildds) for Official.
I learned that the Debian System Administration (DSA) team is responsible for Debian's infrastructure.
I would like to send Server machines to Debian Official. Could you tell me how to do?

- About Server machines
The LoongArch machines are used in Personal Computer, Servers and so on.
We can provide stable Server machines, please see https://www.loongson.cn/application/list?id=3.

- About loong64 buildds in Unofficial port
We have deployed 6 machines and currently have 6 loong64 buildds.
Please see https://buildd.debian.org/status/architecture.php?a=loong64&suite=sid.

- About Debian debci
I am preparing debci machines for debci team.
Please see https://lists.debian.org/debian-ci/2024/05/msg00012.html.

- About ArchiveQualification page
I have created a ArchiveQualification page for loong64. I will update continuously.
Please see https://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/loong64.

- About architecture requalification status for trixie
I have adding the loong64 port to arch_qualify page.
Please see https://release.debian.org/testing/arch_qualify.html.


For loong64, the status of porterbox, buildd-dsa and autopkgtest in the arch_qualify page is "NO".
About porterbox and buildd-dsa, I hope that I could get guidance or suggestions from Debian DSA team.
I am doing this in good faith. Any resources and machines, I am willing to do.

If you have any questions about the loong64 port you can contact me at any time?
If I've handled any of the processes wrong, please don't feel troubled and please correct me.

Thanks,
Dandan Zhang

Reply to: