Re: Future of GNU/kFreeBSD in the debian-ports archive

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org, Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@debian.org>, Adam Borowski <kilobyte@debian.org>, ftpmaster@ports-master.debian.org
Subject: Re: Future of GNU/kFreeBSD in the debian-ports archive
From: Jeremy Bícha <jeremy.bicha@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 17:34:13 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] CAD+GYvzv6LPJsxahae=gG4gjyxRz1JJygPKvabLRxOaE4_LGvQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20230529204251.GA2021550@subdivi.de>
References: <[🔎] ZHTOo993rgKovTpp@aurel32.net> <[🔎] 20230529204251.GA2021550@subdivi.de>

If and when GNU/kFreeBSD is dropped from debian-ports, is it ok to
drop packaging overrides for the architecture from packages in
Unstable?

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha

Reply to:

References:
- Future of GNU/kFreeBSD in the debian-ports archive
  - From: Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>
- Re: Future of GNU/kFreeBSD in the debian-ports archive
  - From: Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Future of GNU/kFreeBSD in the debian-ports archive
Next by Date: Re: Future of GNU/kFreeBSD in the debian-ports archive
Previous by thread: Re: Future of GNU/kFreeBSD in the debian-ports archive
Next by thread: Re: Future of GNU/kFreeBSD in the debian-ports archive
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread