Re: Illegal Instruction Using sudo in Bookworm on i686
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 10:57:41 -0500, Justin <rhys@neoquasar.org> wrote:
>Similar issue in Gentoo:
>https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=862201 <https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=862201>
>
>Similar issue in FreeBSD, more recent, but different processor:
>https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/illegal-instruction-after-12-4-upgrade-i386.89353/ <https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/illegal-instruction-after-12-4-upgrade-i386.89353/>
>
>Relevant GCC commit:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=77d372abec0fbf2cfe922e3140ee3410248f979e <https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=77d372abec0fbf2cfe922e3140ee3410248f979e>
The corresponding Debian issue are probably #1004893 and #1043281
which was boiled down to a GCC issue, #1005863 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104713
As the sudo maintainer, I am reluctant to turn off a hardening feature
to support ancient CPUs. I would be reluctant to do that for a normal
package, but ESPECIALLY for a package like sudo which is installed
nearly everywhere and contains an suid root binary.
I am willing to consider arguments and Ctte advice, but as things are
now I am fine with the current state.
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " |
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Reply to: