Re: Replaces without Breaks or Conflicts harmful? [was: Re: Policy consensus on transition when removing initscripts.]

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Replaces without Breaks or Conflicts harmful? [was: Re: Policy consensus on transition when removing initscripts.]
From: Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 08:19:51 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 8a0c6281-b3c9-e7d5-6708-e8f5cdbe0931@xs4all.nl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20230628194914.GA121503@subdivi.de>
References: <[🔎] 20230625154908.7drimlsuhj4ws4kb@shell.thinkmo.de> <[🔎] 87h6qve7cc.fsf@hope.eyrie.org> <[🔎] e822cf43d58b0fd0102a75219aa79869db8cb496.camel@43-1.org> <[🔎] 154e5e24-4492-02ed-f51b-31487126a809@hogyros.de> <[🔎] 87ttushkwh.fsf@hope.eyrie.org> <[🔎] fc08eee5-ee1b-8f32-d845-37ca13b800f9@hogyros.de> <[🔎] 87o7l0dye2.fsf@hope.eyrie.org> <[🔎] dd8b4c30-2572-6708-dcfb-2edd0126166c@hogyros.de> <[🔎] 87edlwds6z.fsf@hope.eyrie.org> <[🔎] 20230628073703.cb76qndocovdqxxr@jwilk.net> <[🔎] 20230628194914.GA121503@subdivi.de>

On 6/28/23 21:49, Helmut Grohne wrote:

Debian GIS Project <pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
    postgis
    qgis


Why is postgis on this list?

 $ grep -c Replaces debian/control*
 debian/control:0
 debian/control.in:0

Kind Regards,

Bas

--
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Replaces without Breaks or Conflicts harmful? [was: Re: Policy consensus on transition when removing initscripts.]
  - From: Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>

References:
- Re: Policy consensus on transition when removing initscripts.
  - From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
- Re: Policy consensus on transition when removing initscripts.
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Re: Policy consensus on transition when removing initscripts.
  - From: Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org>
- Re: Policy consensus on transition when removing initscripts.
  - From: Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org>
- Re: Policy consensus on transition when removing initscripts.
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Re: Policy consensus on transition when removing initscripts.
  - From: Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org>
- Re: Policy consensus on transition when removing initscripts.
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Re: Policy consensus on transition when removing initscripts.
  - From: Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org>
- Re: Policy consensus on transition when removing initscripts.
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Re: Policy consensus on transition when removing initscripts.
  - From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@jwilk.net>
- Replaces without Breaks or Conflicts harmful? [was: Re: Policy consensus on transition when removing initscripts.]
  - From: Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>

Prev by Date: Bug#1039874: ITP: python-ocspbuilder -- library for generating OCSP requests and responses
Next by Date: Bug#1039876: ITP: golang-maunium-go-mautrix -- Matrix framework in golang
Previous by thread: Replaces without Breaks or Conflicts harmful? [was: Re: Policy consensus on transition when removing initscripts.]
Next by thread: Re: Replaces without Breaks or Conflicts harmful? [was: Re: Policy consensus on transition when removing initscripts.]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread