Le vendredi 24 février 2023, 06:13:48 UTC Shengjing Zhu a écrit : > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 7:38 AM Jonas Smedegaard <email@example.com> wrote: > > > > What to do when a package is blocked from getting updated due to it > > being itself? > > > > I have tried replying to FTPmasters as invited in the rejection message, > > but have been met with silence. > > > > I have tried filing bug#1030961 but have so far seen no response on that > > either. > > > > Will it make sense to reassing that bugreport to the technical > > committee? Or to the release team? Or should I request removal of the > > package, because security bugfixes (however unlikely for a package > > containing purely static data files) is impossible? > > > > > > - Jonas > > > > Quoting Debian FTP Masters (2023-02-09 04:19:39) > > > > > > icc-profiles source: lintian output: 'license-problem-md5sum-non-free-file ECI-RGB.V1.0.icc usual name is ECI-RGB.V1.0.icc. Does not allow modification See also https://packages.debian.org/sid/icc-profiles.', automatically rejected package. Seems like a bug on lintian Feel free to prod me with a small testcase or a patch will try to do something Bastien > [snip] > > > icc-profiles source: lintian output: 'source-only-upload-to-non-free-without-autobuild ', automatically rejected package. > > > icc-profiles source: If you have a good reason, you may override this lintian tag. > > It's auto rejected. So I think it can be technically solved. > For license-problem-md5sum-non-free-file, it's obviously a false > positive from lintian. It should not emit such if the source is the > non-free section. It should be reported as a bug for the lintian > package. And you can submit patches as well, backport to the version > that ftp-master server uses. > For source-only-upload-to-non-free-without-autobuild, it's really a > bug in your upload. You should fix it. > >
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.