[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Yearless copyrights: what do people think?

On 2/22/23 14:26, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Wait, I may have been unclear. I did not mean that I want to omit
> the upstream copyright years *when they are there*.

I know you didn't mean that, nevertheless, it's imho good idea. I'd be
in favour of dropping them from d/copyright an let people have a look at
the "full sources" for the "year detail"-information.

I recently saw that this has been done in knot-resolver for the
"wildcard"-stanza of d/copyright and I like it:


Reply to: